This is subjectivism and relativism in full force.
"... to your satisfaction..."
i.e., "What it means to me."
I don't know all the terms of any particular field; what I do know is what
definitions are and are not.
It's not about my satisfaction, but about what real, nominal, and
non-definitions are. There are rules for those, and we don't get to say
what they are. A word is adequately defined, or it is not.
It's like I'm taking crazy pills.
If it isn't an "issue," then why are they still working to define the
Regardless, the mixed message is received again.
I was done with this site. I already wrote that I believed there to be
something to Dramatica.
People sometimes miss that while the emperor's clothes are denied to exist,
his existence is tacitly affirmed thereby.
I'd walked away from these threads. It's like I killed someone's dog, or
cursed their god, every time I post.
I get it; it's me, not y'all. That's why I'd chosen not to darken your door.
I'm not one of the Dramatica Gnostics. I get that, as well.