Are you respectively mapping desire, ability, thought, knowledge to (layman’s words) want/won’t, can/can’t, need/needn’t, should/shouldn’t?
Then from there, are you using the layman’s words to get a feel?
Then, once you get the feel for the right word, are you mapping the laymen’s word back to its appropriate KTAD?
Then, that gives you the root motivation, thus the accurate justification phrase?
(I have to say, this feels like slowing down the lightening fast processes of the brain in order to explain the way it works things out.)
Ultimately, it leads to a justification phrase that contains the entire KTAD within it.
Did I get that right?