When reading your post, it felt it was very well rounded, gotta say. Hard to describe...but I felt the whole argument covered all bases. The base that struck me strongest was the objectivity aspect you mentioned, but perhaps for a different reader it would be a different aspect of your argument. Or, maybe it’s the completeness that gives this fullness effect.
Is that what a reader feels like after reading a work structured using D? Seriously impressed. Cool that you used the D principles to demonstrate its power.