Sorry if it’s inappropriate for me to post this question here, but I’m having a similar problem understanding problem solving style, especially in relation to The French Connection.
Using the filter set to the following settings…
MC RESOLVE: Steadfast
MC GROWTH: Stop
MC APPROACH: Do-er
MC PROBLEM-SOLVING STYLE: Linear
DRIVER: Action
LIMIT: Optionlock
OUTCOME: Success
JUDGMENT: Bad
Three films pop up, including The French Connection. While watching the film, I’m struck by how much Popeye Doyle seems more an intuitive cop than a linear one.
As a protagonist doing cop stuff, Doyle is linear by the very nature of the police investigation, gathering information and looking for connections that lead to a major drug bust. But as a main character, isn’t he someone who follows his intuition, jumping to conclusions about people and their intentions based on appearances – as he does in the first bar scene where he spots someone tossing too much money around?
A few scenes later, when he discovers the streets are dry, he learns a major shipment is on it’s way and then concludes that the person he’s tailing has something to do with the coming shipment, but no clear connection between those two things is, from my understanding, ever established.
Finally, isn’t it his holistic style that puts him at odds with his colleagues? Even one of the detectives comments, “Yeah, I know Popeye. His brilliant hunches cost the life of a good cop.”
EDIT: Ah, wait, my bad. I missed the character element of “Hunch” which represents Doyle’s M.O. Sorry for the noise.
So Doyle is looking for connections. If he can find the drugs and link them to the French Man, then he’ll have his case. Linear.