When the story begins, there is an inequity (which everyone agrees there is) Yet people disagree the cause of the inequity. For society, the people moving the OS, that inequity is the presence of these “misfits.” But the MC is considered a misfit, and her family has been swept away to wherever these misfits are taken. So for the MC, the way society is fixing the inequity is unacceptable–she wants it another way, (Avoid, Reconsider, Reaction, Unproven, etc).
Except for the few people who know the MC’s secret, everyone wants in different ways to rid the world of these misfits. If they can finish the job, great things will happen. If they don’t they’ll remain in this non-arrived state of flex and hoping and wishing. The MC knows the scientist has set misfits up as the scapegoat to accomplish his utopia. She also knows the larger danger from letting society move forward with this plan.
OS Domain: Fixed Attitude
The Goal: to rid the world of autonomous thinkers "misfits’ Everyone agreeing (Contemplation-“when one is fully aware of detrimental consequences and still decides on the poor course of action, there is something wrong with the way one arrives at conclusions”) the scientist knows he’s created a scapegoat for personal reasons but he evaluates things this way.
MC POV: [quote=“Lakis, post:5, topic:2259”]
the fact that the scientist has persuaded society to do this the inequity that starts the story
[/quote]
OS POV: The existence of misfits (MC included, though ‘NonAccurate’ and unidentified as yet ) is the inequity keeping us from utopia.
The Consequence of failing: The Present–stuck like this, trying never arriving. (OS inhibitor: Attempt)
Solution: Re-evaluate. Outcome: Failure Issue: Doubt They don’t ever re-evaluate things or doubt what the leader says, so they’re stuck in the Present like this–until book 2 of the series. But the MC’s Re-evaluate is working, (so Judgment: Good) little by little on society.
From another post