Yves believes in the synthetic model, which (in short) is what you get when you take a lot of samples, and determine what in them makes them tick. It’s what Aristotle did, and what almost everybody else does too.
I think as a mental stance towards story design it is behind the times. It can be a way of discovering wonderful methods of storytelling, and lots of the examples here are proof that Yves does this very well. But it has to be discarded before you can really grasp the essence of Dramatica: that stories take the shape of arguments, and screenplays and novels are a way to convey that story. Most synthesists, so far as I can tell, think that the start of a book is also the start of the story. The end is the end. We know that not to be true.
I guess my point is that he would have a serious amount of work waiting for him if he were to change horses now. But yes, I’d be curious.