I think the better way to look at this is:
OS Concern == X
OS Goal == X
*RS Concern == Y
OS Consequence == Y
…and so on.
The fact that different story points share a common element or type does not force you to equate them in your narrative – the audience ‘storymind’ will do that on its own. Besides, any element, such as “Becoming,” will look different through the lens of an OS Static Appreciation (like Consequence) from how it looks through the lens of a RS Dynamic Appreciation (like Concern).
*RS is short for Relationship Story, a better label for M/I