We recently analyzed The Wrath of Khan and as we argued points we would look below the appreciations to back our argument for it, i.e. when choosing a concern we would look below to the issues to see if they ‘felt’ right. and so on down to the problem/solution. So I question the wisdom in using the plot sequence report to argue a storyform.
Unless, you specify that you are using the PSR and arguing from a purely subjective POV (what it feels like to be inside the story)
In this link to a reply [Dramatica.com Q&A reply to a question regarding the Plot Sequence Report][1] it says:
The reason we did not include more views/insights into the screwed up view of things from inside the story is because it is very difficult to analyze your story from that perspective, largely due to the completely subjective nature of the perspective. Also, most writers have more difficulty getting some objectivity on their material than they do getting inside their material—particularly during the analytical phase of writing. Armando (Mora), however, gives some very practical tips on using the “messed up view” provided by the Plot Sequence Report to create scenes.
Can one analyze a story with the PSR? Is the PSR purely an Overall Story subjective POV for the Overall Characters?
[1]: http://dramatica.com/questions/how-do-i-make-sense-of-the-plot-sequence-report