1 I don’t understand why the IC Crucial Element is on the MC, and why the MC Crucial Element is on the Antagonist. The IC is not the Antagonist.
2 It’s also unintuitive to me that the Crucial Elements are in the Evaluation set.
I just read the formulation for Crucial Element - if change and success, MC CE is Problem, so that actually checks out here. But his Problem is assigned to another character.
I guess I just don’t understand how to read this graphic.
… a few minutes later…
ok, I think I am making this too complicated in my head.
-
the MC CE is indeed unproven. That is all that red triangle means. There’s no relationship to the Antagonist just because its being labeled in the Antagonist’s tile. it’s a separate piece of information.
-
Ditto the IC characteristic. Also, the that it has not been listed in the IC’s problem/solution is fine. The IC CE is the Dynamic pair’s other element, the Solution. Just the way it works. And as with Antagonist, it’s just a labeling of the element -There’s no relationship to the Protagonist just because its being labeled in the Protagonists tile. it’s a separate piece of information.
IOW the triangles are just saying, very simply, ‘hey! these are the Crucial Elements! Right here! Look no further!’