Many of the definitions of self-interest seem to have a negative spin (greed, conceited, meanness, mercenary, etc.).
But what is the positive spin of self-interest?
Any ideas?
Many of the definitions of self-interest seem to have a negative spin (greed, conceited, meanness, mercenary, etc.).
But what is the positive spin of self-interest?
Any ideas?
For more positive Self-Interesr, maybe try something like⊠greed, conceited, meanness, mercenary, etc.
This is the key phrase here. If I donât feel like Iâm getting paid enough of a commission and I want more (greed) and I start my own business, that creates competition with my previous employer which drives innovation, lowers prices for consumers, and lowers unemployment. Whatâs negative about that?
I agree! Nothing wrong with being self-interested
Saving your own life is also an action of self-interest - nothing wrong with that!
However, lots of the definitions Iâve come across define self-interest in relation to others (as in Morality) hence the, âif Iâm looking after myself so I canât look after youâ.
self-interest is generally defined in relation to another, which is what gives it a bad rep.
Isnât positive self-interest taking care of oneself first so one can care for another (in better ways, for a longer time)?
Itâs the old âput the oxygen mask on yourself first, then put it on the child.â
It also doesnât have to involve another person. For example, I choose to get more sleep so I can allow my body to recover from the previous day, reduce my stress, and be more alert the next day.
Positive spin of Self-InterestâŠ
Depends on the context, some of the example might be a good fit as well in »Protection«.
Iâm going to assume what youâre hoping for is some positive gists that could fall under self-interest
Advocate for oneself
Encourage oneself
Honor oneself
Beautify oneself
Awaken oneself
Relax
Charm others
Consider oneself
Nominate oneself
Accept oneself
Defend oneself
Calm oneself
Console oneself
Secure oneself
Endure
Entreat for oneself
Free oneself
Express oneself
Discipline oneself (the good kind)
Exonerate oneself
If you need more let me know
Thank you, Diane!
gsdfgldsjga
Iâm reminded of Ayn Rand saying, âSelfishness is a virtue.â
âYet the exact meaning and dictionary definition of the word âselfishnessâ is: concern with oneâs own interests. This concept does not include a moral evaluation; it does not tell us whether concern with oneâs own interests is good or evil; nor does it tell us what constitutes manâs actual interests. It is the task of ethics to answer such questions.â
Sheâd say a healthy, purposeful, fulfilling life would require self-interest; a selfish person is a self-respecting, self-supporting human being who neither sacrifices others to themselves nor sacrifices themselves for others.
Sounds positive to me.
Or, you can do it yourself
At the bottom of every Element is a form where you can submit suggestions. If they fit, I approve and add them to the general collection. If not, I send you an email explaining why.
The last thousand or so are all user-submitted.
Hereâs the page for Self-interest: https://app.narrativefirst.com/elements/illustrations/self-interest
Just please please please submit them in the typical Illustration form. For example:
Are all great.
Not so much. Theyâre too general. And while I can see how relaxing and charming others could be self-interested behavior, they veer too far away from definitively illustrating a process of Self-interestâthey could be interpreted as almost anything. Attitude and Approach might actually be better issues for these last two.
You just have to be careful because every Element in a quad is measured by the Co-Dynamic Pair. Self-interest, while problematic as an Issue in a potential story, is only appreciated through Approaches and Attitudesâwhich is what is happening with some of these examples.
Instinctively, everyone will gravitate towards these two to describe Self-interest. Thatâs great when writing a story (and much preferable then hitting everyone over the head with Self-interest directly), but less so when developing a comprehensive list of illustrations for writers to call upon.
I submitted a couple so far but the list is long and I assumed I could only submit one at a time.
But, if I can submit them all in one go, that would be so much more effiecient. I didnât think that was possibleâŠbut you learn something new every day
You can submit as many as you want. Forcing you to enter one at a time encourages more deliberationâŠ
One of the most famous lines in movie history puts it simply: GreedâŠis good.
âI am not a destroyer of companies. I am a liberator of them! The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA. Thank you very much.â
Gordon Gecko
Wall Street
Itâs a real moral argument. Gecko believes itâs true. And the argument works becauseâŠwell, it is true. Sort of. And not true, sort of. Both at the same time. Itâs what gives the protagonist and the antagonist moral space to maneuver. Itâs an issue worth arguing about. Soviet Communism arose in part because of a hatred of greed, and of course that worked out really well for the Russian peasants and the world. On the other hand, vast inequity in the world now, and the rise of authoritarian rule, and hatred of democracy by the global elite, also because of greed.
Hi!
I was attracted to this discussion because thatâs an argument Iâm trying to make in a short story Iâm currently fixing.
I think itâs pretty easy to come up with contexts in which self-interest is good, because it aligns with morality (ie doing something that is both beneficial to you, to those around you, and perhaps to humanity as a whole). But as long as self-interest and morality coincide, there is no conflict, and therefore no story.
Whatâs harder is imagining a context in which self-interest battles it out with morality (which is what the dynamic pair in the Dramatica pattern dictates), and self-interest still comes out on top.
My take is that you can play with the different levels of âothersâ. Sometimes pursuing your self-interest is beneficial to both you and your inner circle, but not to humanity or the world at large, or vice versa. I donât think anyone can make an argument in favor of self-interest without taking into account the benefits for some others. The whole question (and where disagreements arise) is which others. I once read an interesting article about a conservative thinker, which summed up the difference between conservative and progressive thinking patterns pretty much in this way (conservatives favor close others, be they family, locals, or their country; whereas progressives usually think in more global, quantitative terms: what benefits the most people?).
You can also articulate self-interest vs morality in terms of means vs end. In my story, the MC is determined to kill the big bad tyrant to take his place. His argument is that a person more concerned with morality, and with less personal ambition (ie self-interest), wouldnât have what it takes to seize power in such a context. Either they would balk at the idea of killing their opponents, or they wouldnât make the necessary compromises to garner sufficient support.
Now Iâm not trying to paint this in a super positive light either, but simply as a (possibly) more realistic step towards something good than, say, an overnight revolution of everything. Kind of like âa bird in the hand is worth two in the bushâ.
[quote=âJeanne1, post:15, topic:2872â]
I think itâs pretty easy to come up with contexts in which self-interest is good, because it aligns with morality⊠[/quote]
It seems to me thatâs like saying, âI think it is pretty easy to come up with contexts in which black is good, because it aligns with white.â
If you go to the Dramatica dictionary and read the definitions of Morality and Self-interest, youâll find it is impossible for them to align in Dramatica terms.
Itâs really easy for me to let standard definitions seep into the argument. I have to look at the Dramatica dictionary to make sure I understand the denotation as Dramatica has decided it.
Self-interest comes out on top because it leads to success in regard the OS Concern. Morality would have led to failure. Good or bad is about the Judgement, right?
Agree with everything else but Iâm not sure this is right. Self-interest is at the Issue level, so I donât think itâs tied definitively to the OS Solution in that way. For example, Black Panther is Success-Good, Issue of Self-Interest â but at the end of the film Tâchalla chooses to reveal Wakanda âfor the good of the worldâ.
Issue is typically thought of as the theme level: so in story with an OS Issue of Self-Interest, there would be all kinds of questions raised about the proper role of Self-Interest. There might be problems around too much Self-Interest or too little. This might be contrasted with Morality (as the Counterpoint) but the thematic focus would be on Self-Interest.
âAlignsâ fits. I meant that choosing either process would lead to the same result (at any rate, itâs clearly with this expectation/hope that such instances of self-interest are deemed âgoodâ). In these contexts, both values âagreeâ with each other, even though they describe reverse processes.
Indeed, if you look at all these actions from the outside, itâs impossible to tell whether theyâre motivated by self-interest or morality. Thereâs nothing inherently self-interested about them. They would only prove to be self-interested if, confronted with a moral alternative in a very specific context, one would still not change course.
Except I doubt that anybody here would argue that these examples of self-interest remain âgoodâ if you have to knowingly sacrifice morality to achieve them. Now, of course it depends how big the sacrifice is (telling a white lie once vs. killing a lot of people, to pick two extremes). But then weâre back to comparing moral benefits, or means vs. ends, which is what I did.
For me one the clearest examples of Self Interest being âpositiveâ is an overworked, overtaxed mother whoâs always doing everything for her kids and extended family, ageing parents etc. and never taking any time for herself. Yes, when she finally decides to take care of herself and take a spa day, it might mean the laundry doesnât get done and the boys have to fend for themselves at dinner. But so what? She has been putting others first for so long, itâs time she did something for herself for once.
That example sacrifices Morality for Self Interest (the mother stops taking care of everyone else in order to focus on herself), but I would argue that itâs still âgoodâ.
Remember, Morality is just âdoing or being based on what is best for othersâ â it doesnât have in a good way tacked on to that. It could be doing what is best for others when they donât want you to. Or when they donât agree about what you think is best.
Yes â this is a good example of how any term you use can be loaded with certain connotations. Another is Jimâs favorite example of Uncontrolled. He sometimes likes âFreeâ better â but again itâs context dependent. Free is great for someone whoâs a free spirit, or who is driven to escape from the overbearing hands of others. But âUncontrolledâ might be better for someone who is really causing problems because theyâre out of control (especially when paired with Feeling which give us the Emotion archetype).